Alternative to captive Liahona for general use in Institute buildings

Discussions about Internet service providers (ISPs), the Meetinghouse Firewall, wired and wireless networking, usage, management, and support of Meetinghouse Internet
byerlyb20
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2026 4:49 pm

Alternative to captive Liahona for general use in Institute buildings

Post by byerlyb20 »

The Logan Institute encourages students to come and use open areas as study space but the captive portal enforced by the Liahona network is annoying for frequent visitors who connect multiple devices. If you couldn't tell, I am one of these students :D but I hear this complaint from others too.

I belong to a stake that uses a different building, but there are stakes that use the institute building for Sunday meetings. Who manages the networks in these shared buildings? Who to contact with this feedback? Anyone aware of church capabilities that could be useful here? Years ago, the Logan Institute had a separate network for students (iirc it used a captive portal also but the lease time was longer—this was LDSAccess era).
lajackson
Community Moderators
Posts: 11908
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: US

Re: Alternative to captive Liahona for general use in Institute buildings

Post by lajackson »

byerlyb20 wrote: Thu Sep 03, 2026 5:14 pm Who manages the networks in these shared buildings? Who to contact with this feedback?
The stake technology specialist manages the network, but has no control over the firewall, which is managed from Church headquarters. Right now, Liahona is the WiFi SSID that is used and requires a daily acknowledgement when connecting.

Your Institute leaders may have a minor amount of influence to request changes. I would start with them.

Return to “Meetinghouse Internet”