Senior missionary finances
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 9:59 pm
A senior couple in my ward who will depart for a mission next month informed me that they plan to pay their monthly payments ($1550/month, consisting of the $1400 housing cap + $150 car allowance) into the main ward missionary fund, as opposed to the sub-account in their name. Their reason is they do not believe their payments will be tax-deductible if they pay them into an account that has their name associated with it. Assuming they go ahead with this plan, I assume I will need to transfer their payments into their sub-account so that they can be matched up with the monthly charges.
I respect this couple's risk aversion with how they do their taxes--and transferring their funds each month is not a hard thing to do--but for my own education, is there anything unique about senior couples' payments that makes them different from the thousands of missionaries who pay into their own sub-accounts and still take tax deductions? I can kind-of see where they might be coming from, given that the $1400 amount is specifically related to housing and the $150 is specifically related to their car use (as opposed to $400 for their "mission" like young single missionaries), but still, it seems like the same principle applies to everyone: they are paying an amount that is nonrefundable and the money is going to the Church rather than directly to their own landlord. Is that true, or are senior couples in a unique situation?
I emphasize, I am not looking for tax advice on this forum. I am simply trying to understand the difference, if any, between senior couples' payments and young single missionaries' payments.
I respect this couple's risk aversion with how they do their taxes--and transferring their funds each month is not a hard thing to do--but for my own education, is there anything unique about senior couples' payments that makes them different from the thousands of missionaries who pay into their own sub-accounts and still take tax deductions? I can kind-of see where they might be coming from, given that the $1400 amount is specifically related to housing and the $150 is specifically related to their car use (as opposed to $400 for their "mission" like young single missionaries), but still, it seems like the same principle applies to everyone: they are paying an amount that is nonrefundable and the money is going to the Church rather than directly to their own landlord. Is that true, or are senior couples in a unique situation?
I emphasize, I am not looking for tax advice on this forum. I am simply trying to understand the difference, if any, between senior couples' payments and young single missionaries' payments.