Social Networking Survey
-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 35585
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
- Location: U.S.
- mkmurray
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
- Location: Utah
- Contact:
Remember how in one thread Tom said the IP addresses that moderators could see were coming through as the same IP address, the IP address of the Church's gateway hardware?RussellHltn wrote:I'm getting the feeling that link is only good for one shot. It was reset, I took it, and now every one else sees it as completed. Maybe that's why I saw "suggested" answers?
I wonder if this is a similar situation, the survey thinks we are all coming from the same location because we clicked the link from Tom's post...
- McDanielCA
- Member
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:38 pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
- WelchTC
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2085
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:51 am
- Location: Kaysville, UT, USA
- Contact:
-
- New Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:58 pm
RussellHltn wrote:OK, it worked, but I found some thing odd. For example, in Question #2, it allowed me to select multiple answer (hot much time spent in social software.) I'd think there would only be one answer.
I also found the survey "suggested" answers by creating defaults which influenced my answers.
I found the "based on 100 points question rather odd. Seems like it would be difficult to make sure it all added up to 100.
I was also confused by having "neutral" between "important" and "slightly important". It doesn't strike me as a linear order of importance.
Thanks for the input. Question 2 has been reset to be one answer.
The constant sum was introduced so we can identify the relative importance of the factors. While the exact number is not the goal, we should be able to infer some finding from the answers provided.
We tried to use predefined scales with good statistical cronbach alpha. Nonetheless, I will share your concerns with the team.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:58 pm
Let me post this shortcut url: http://esmt.social.sgizmo.commkmurray wrote:Remember how in one thread Tom said the IP addresses that moderators could see were coming through as the same IP address, the IP address of the Church's gateway hardware?
I wonder if this is a similar situation, the survey thinks we are all coming from the same location because we clicked the link from Tom's post...
Please report back if this addresses the issue. All settings in the survey remain the same.
Thanks again for the support.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:58 pm
- mkmurray
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
- Location: Utah
- Contact:
Ok, I was able to get in from my home computer now...yvan wrote:Let me post this shortcut url: http://esmt.social.sgizmo.com
Please report back if this addresses the issue. All settings in the survey remain the same.
Thanks again for the support.
- WelchTC
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2085
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:51 am
- Location: Kaysville, UT, USA
- Contact:
- thedqs
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:53 am
- Location: Redmond, WA
- Contact: